Sequence of total
Message part number; for a single-part LC the value is 1/1.
Paste a SWIFT MT700 letter-of-credit message. The tool decodes each tag and explains it in plain English, with watch-outs from real chemical-trade LCs.
Message part number; for a single-part LC the value is 1/1.
Type of LC. IRREVOCABLE is the only acceptable form under UCP 600 (revocable was deprecated in UCP 500). TRANSFERABLE flags that the LC can be reissued to a second beneficiary.
Issuing-bank LC reference. Quote this number on every shipping document and every invoice.
Linked SWIFT pre-advice reference if the LC was pre-advised.
Date the LC was issued by the issuing bank.
UCP 600 is the standard; ISP98 for standby; eUCP for paperless presentation.
Last date and the city where compliant documents may be presented. Documents presented after this date or to a different city are non-compliant.
The buyer (importer) on whose behalf the LC was issued.
Bank where the applicant holds the account that will fund the LC.
The seller (exporter) who will be paid against compliant documents. Name and address must match the commercial invoice exactly.
LC face value. Currency in 3-letter ISO; amount as a decimal.
Allowable plus-or-minus on the LC amount, given as two slash-separated percent values.
Caps the LC face value when 39A tolerance does not apply.
Premiums, freight, insurance, or interest covered on top of 32B.
Where the LC is available (named bank or any bank) and how (sight payment, deferred payment, acceptance, or negotiation).
Tenor of any draft (bill of exchange) drawn on the LC. AT SIGHT for sight LC; 30 / 60 / 90 / 180 DAYS AFTER B/L DATE for usance.
The party on which any draft is drawn. Usually the issuing bank or a confirming bank.
Multi-instalment or part-sight, part-usance arrangements.
Deferred-payment LC settlement schedule (no draft, just a fixed payment date).
ALLOWED or NOT ALLOWED.
ALLOWED or NOT ALLOWED.
The port or inland place where the carrier takes charge of the goods.
Port (sea) or airport (air) where the goods are loaded onto the carrying vessel or aircraft.
Port or airport where the goods are unloaded.
Final delivery place if not the discharge port (multimodal).
Last date the BL may be issued (for sea cargo) or the AWB may be issued (for air). BL date after this is a fatal discrepancy.
Shipping window if a single date is too tight (e.g. weekly sailings).
Cargo description, quantity, unit price, and Incoterm. The invoice description must match this verbatim or be a fair restatement; gross overstatement triggers discrepancy.
List of every document the beneficiary must present. Common set: signed commercial invoice, packing list, full set 3/3 originals BL, certificate of origin, certificate of analysis, beneficiary certificate. Each item is a hurdle; missing one is a fatal discrepancy.
Special conditions like 3rd-party documents accepted, charterparty BL acceptable, latest presentation 21 days from BL date, etc. Most discrepancy disputes start here.
Days after BL on-board date by which compliant documents must be presented. UCP 600 default is 21 days; LC can specify shorter.
CONFIRM (you confirm and stand behind), MAY ADD (advising bank may add at beneficiary cost), WITHOUT (no confirmation).
Bank that reimburses the negotiating / paying / accepting bank for funds advanced to the beneficiary.
Second-step advising bank if not the same as the beneficiary bank.
Bank-charge allocation: ALL CHARGES OUTSIDE COUNTRY OF ISSUING BANK ARE FOR ACCOUNT OF BENEFICIARY is most common. Read carefully; can erode margin by 0.5 to 1 percent.
Routing instructions for handover of funds and documents.
Free-text bank-to-bank notes; not part of the LC terms but often clarifies routing.
A documentary credit (letter of credit, or LC) is the bank guarantee that bridges trust between an importer and an exporter who do not know each other. The LC commits the issuing bank to pay the beneficiary on presentation of compliant documents. The LC terms (the SWIFT MT700) define what "compliant" means; the beneficiary either presents documents that match the terms verbatim and gets paid, or fails to match and faces a discrepancy notice and a refusal to pay.
For Chinese-origin chemical exports to Australia, US, or Europe, the LC review is the most important commercial step after the contract is signed. The terms set the latest shipment date (44C), the partial-shipment policy (43P), the transhipment policy (43T), the documents required (46A), the additional conditions (47A), and the period for presentation (48). Each is a tripwire. Latest shipment 260930 means the BL on-board date must be on or before 30 September 2026; one day late, the LC is non-compliant. Partial shipments NOT ALLOWED means one BL for the full LC quantity; you cannot split into two containers and present two BLs. Transhipment NOT ALLOWED kills most multi-leg routings.
The documents required field (46A) is the longest and most-edited. A typical chemical-trade LC requires signed commercial invoice in 3 originals plus 2 copies, packing list in 3 originals plus 2 copies, full-set 3/3 original BL marked "Freight Prepaid" or "Freight Collect" depending on Incoterm, certificate of origin from CCPIT or CIQ, certificate of analysis from manufacturer, beneficiary certificate of compliance. Each item is a hurdle; missing one is a fatal discrepancy.
Discrepancy is the single biggest pain point. UCP 600 article 14 sets the standard for examination: documents are examined on their face for compliance with the LC terms. Common discrepancies in chemical-trade LCs: BL on-board date after 44C latest shipment; goods description in invoice does not match 45A verbatim; beneficiary spelling on invoice does not match 59 letter-by-letter; partial shipment when 43P says NOT ALLOWED; missing original BL because one was couriered separately. The LC review catches these hours, not days, before the BL is issued.
For an upgrade with discrepancy-pattern detection across 30+ common LC clauses, see Sourzi /tools/documentation/lc-document-checker-rule-based once shipped, and the Phase 3 AI-powered version at /tools/documentation/lc-document-checker-ai-powered.
The standardised SWIFT message format for "Issue of a Documentary Credit". When an issuing bank opens a letter of credit, it sends an MT700 to the advising bank, which advises the beneficiary. The MT700 has roughly 35 standardised fields (tags) that carry the LC terms. This tool decodes them.
LC text is dense, abbreviated, and full of bank jargon. A small terminology miss at LC review (e.g. transhipment NOT ALLOWED versus ALLOWED, latest shipment date 260930 versus 260830) leads to a fatal discrepancy at presentation, which leads to non-payment or a refusal-to-pay letter from the issuing bank. Decoding each MT700 field in plain English at LC review catches issues before the goods ship.
No. This is a plain-English reference for the SWIFT MT700 standard. UCP 600 governs LC interpretation; ICC Banking Commission publishes DOCDEX decisions and the ICC Opinions for case law. For high-value LCs, run a documentary-credit professional review (DOCDEX, ICC, or your bank trade-finance desk).
Reference rates for Chinese 银承贴现 by issuing-bank tier, with the rate-stack breakdown and the 3% premium foreign buyers do not see.
Open tool →
11 payment terms (T/T upfront, T/T 30/70, LC sight/30/60/90, DP, DA, OA 30/60/90) compared in days from shipment, dollars of working capital, and percent of order value at user cost-of-capital.
Open tool →
Discount fee + admin + FX cost on a future receivable. Returns net proceeds + effective annualised cost. 360 / 365 day-count selector.
Open tool →